[VIEWED 1377
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
Sexy In Sari
Please log in to subscribe to Sexy In Sari's postings.
Posted on 01-20-25 10:58
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
If a child is born in the U.S. to TPS parents, the U.S. government will not recognize the child as a U.S. citizen if: The mother was in the U.S. legally but temporarily (like with TPS), and The father is not a U.S. citizen or a green card holder.
This means the child will not get a U.S. birth certificate, passport, or other citizenship documents.
|
|
|
|
Sexy In Sari
Please log in to subscribe to Sexy In Sari's postings.
Posted on 01-20-25 11:02
PM [Snapshot: 6]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
From February 19, 2025, these children may no longer be recognized as U.S. citizens, even if they are born on U.S. soil.
|
|
|
Sampurna pokhrel
Please log in to subscribe to Sampurna pokhrel's postings.
Posted on 01-20-25 11:10
PM [Snapshot: 25]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
R u sure it willll be implemented ? BS
|
|
|
bhamnepali
Please log in to subscribe to bhamnepali's postings.
Posted on 01-20-25 11:47
PM [Snapshot: 92]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
1
?
Liked by
|
|
SIS, I know you like it, but it’s not retroactive. First, it’s proactive—if you have U.S. citizenship, it won’t apply retroactively. Second, this is more of a stunt. It’s protected by the Constitution, making it difficult to change without amendments.
|
|
|
Sampurna pokhrel
Please log in to subscribe to Sampurna pokhrel's postings.
Posted on 01-20-25 11:50
PM [Snapshot: 113]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
What do you think democrates wont overturn this law again after 4 yrs? 14th amendment will never ever go .
|
|
|
bhamnepali
Please log in to subscribe to bhamnepali's postings.
Posted on 01-20-25 11:58
PM [Snapshot: 129]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Ending birthright citizenship would require more than just a simple majority or support from Democrats. It would need approval from three-fourths of Congress and ratification by 38 out of 50 states. This is simply a political stunt aimed at energizing his base by making it look like he tried. Also, the “jurisdiction thereof” argument is not going to work. If it stands, it would mean that foreign nationals could act without consequences.
|
|
|
chicagoan
Please log in to subscribe to chicagoan's postings.
Posted on 01-21-25 9:48
AM [Snapshot: 690]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
This is not retroactive. And it’s not finalized yet, I don’t understand this scare mongering. I see sadism here. People have enough struggles to live a normal life. Why add pain?
|
|
|
bhamnepali
Please log in to subscribe to bhamnepali's postings.
Posted on 01-21-25 10:55
AM [Snapshot: 776]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
It is just a fanfare to rile up his base like SIS. Even though it is proactive, I am sure it has no chances of holding up. Lawsuits have already been filed and will be enjoined before it even starts. MAGAts are getting caught up in this too.
|
|
|
logan
Please log in to subscribe to logan's postings.
Posted on 01-21-25 11:24
AM [Snapshot: 798]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
It has to pass by House and Congress, long way to go. You will see many tricks as a street charmer. You entered happily and if you have to go back, go happily.
|
|
|
Sampurna pokhrel
Please log in to subscribe to Sampurna pokhrel's postings.
Posted on 01-21-25 11:45
AM [Snapshot: 827]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Yo lai kehi pani thaha chaina …. JPt bolna aaucha … lawsuits are coming Last edited: 21-Jan-25 12:09 PM
Last edited: 21-Jan-25 12:27 PM
|
|
|
ujl
Please log in to subscribe to ujl's postings.
Posted on 01-21-25 11:59
AM [Snapshot: 848]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Hey Sajha Folks, US Citizenship by Birth is protected by US Constitution and cannot be just changed by an executive order. The judicial system will block such executive order if it doesn't align with the US Constitution.
|
|
|