On March 6, lawyers for TPS holders sent a short letter to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The letter supports their request for the full court to review the Nepal TPS case again. The lawyers pointed to another TPS case in New York where a judge delayed the end of TPS for Syria. They told the court that the government itself says different courts are making different decisions on TPS stays. Because of this conflict, the lawyers argue that the full Ninth Circuit should rehear the case.
Sexy In Sari · Mar 7, 2026 10:45 AM · 6,116 views
Source: law360.com Former Judges’ Brief Flagged in Ninth Circuit Nepal TPS Stay Fight Counsel for TPS holders from Nepal and other countries notified the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on March 6 that a group of former judges has weighed in on a related dispute over the treatment of unexplained Supreme Court stay orders. In a Rule 28(j) letter, attorney Ahilan Arulanantham informed the court that 175 former federal and state judges filed an amicus brief supporting respondents in Noem v. Dahlia Doe before the Supreme Court of the United States. The judges’ brief focuses on how lower courts should treat Supreme Court stay orders that provide no reasoning. According to the letter, that question is directly relevant to the Ninth Circuit’s stay in National TPS Alliance v. Noem. Arulanantham argued the development strengthens the case for rehearing the TPS dispute en banc, asking the full Ninth Circuit to reconsider the panel’s stay affecting TPS protections for nationals of Nepal and other countries.
Sexy In Sari · Mar 7, 2026 11:13 AM
महोदय ल ३६०ले एउटा कूड़ा भंचा. द हिलले आर्को. के हो के हो ?
Oops i did it again · Mar 7, 2026 9:23 PM
This conversation is preserved exactly as it was on the original Sajha.com and can't accept new replies.
Start a New Discussion