TPS for Nepal is set to end on August 5, 2025, but a court case about Afghanistan’s TPS may help. If the court rules that DHS gave too little notice, it could lead to a six-month extension. The same rule might apply to Nepal. This extra time can give breathing room for those with pending cases or preparing other applications. If the court agrees on the late notice issue, Nepal may not need to file its own lawsuit for this part. Stay updated. Good luck!!
Sexy In Sari · Jun 16, 2025 11:32 AM · 12,429 views
Kahile cha hearing chai?
ShaniDev · Jun 16, 2025 1:17 PM
Oh, that’s cute — but that’s not how administrative law works. The court doesn’t just squint at “statutory violations” and call it a day. If that were the case, the entire Administrative Procedure Act (APA) might as well not exist. Courts absolutely review whether DHS followed proper procedure — including whether it gave adequate notice, allowed meaningful comment, and didn’t act arbitrarily or capriciously. Giving “short” vs. “long” notice” is not some trivial issue. It goes to fairness, reasonableness, and whether the regulated community had time to prepare and respond — all of which are squarely within the court’s review powers under APA. If DHS drops a major decision with zero lead time, that’s a procedural defect, and yes, the court can and will review that. And let’s not pretend DHS is above reproach. Courts have repeatedly smacked down agencies for failing to follow notice-and-comment norms or blindsiding people with last-minute actions. TPS terminations are no exception. So no, it’s not just “did DHS break a law.” It’s also “did DHS follow the process it’s legally bound to follow.” If they didn’t? The court absolutely can — and has — intervened.
Sql_server · Jun 16, 2025 1:32 PM
Kathiko chance hola ta ? the chatgpt says hearing for Afghanistan and Cameroon is July 11. I am not sure how reliable it is.
Pardeshimanche · Jun 16, 2025 6:48 PM
Hey, looks like my earlier comment disappeared—no biggie. Just want to say, it’s not really about the “too little notice” part. The court’s gonna focus on whether DHS actually broke the APA rules. It’s more about facts than feelings, you know? Also, let’s keep it cool—no need for any misleading. All good vibes here. ✌️
Sql_server · Jun 18, 2025 5:36 PM
@Sql_server, I think when Sexy said "too little notice", she is trying to say too little time for the notice period. Basically, you are saying the same thing. There is no need to argue.
ShaniDev · Jun 18, 2025 5:45 PM
This conversation is preserved exactly as it was on the original Sajha.com and can't accept new replies.
Start a New Discussion